When the English got serious about
colonizing Ireland the most enduring change they made was to rename
our towns.
We had survived every successive wave of plundering invader, but when the Empire changed our place names they changed our reality. Words accomplished what swords could not.
We had survived every successive wave of plundering invader, but when the Empire changed our place names they changed our reality. Words accomplished what swords could not.
So it turns out there's quite a lot in
a name.
I bring this up because I remember all
the utterly empty rhetoric that I used to hear in the news in the
darkest years of the Troubles. Each day brought a torrent of
increasingly exhausted words: outrage, atrocity, condemnation,
retaliation.
Your eyes started glazing over before
they wheeled on the inevitable religious leader (of whichever
denomination) to express his (it was always a man) views on the
latest killing.
'I - condemn - this - outrage - and -
atrocity - and - I - implore - there - be - no - retaliation…'
In the north too long a sacrifice had
made the language numb. It prolonged our suffering by being unequal
to it. It had diminished our capacity to get beyond things. Words had
literally failed us.
When words fail you it's the best
indication you have that you're standing at a crisis point. Feeling
completely unequal to the task means you're staring at a job worth
doing. Feeing unable to express it means that you absolutely must.
These are lessons that all the decades of suffering in the north have
taught me. I don't know much, but I know that anguish that is immense
and unspeakable is the harbinger of extraordinary change.
When I read the news about the
shootings in Connecticut on Friday I despaired, like most people do
in the face of inexplicable horror. But perhaps unlike a lot of
people in that state I have seen that kind of horror up close before.
A few years after the transformative
ceasefire was announced and the peace process had begun in the north, I was on an Aer Lingus flight
from New York to Ireland when the young woman seated next to me
turned and said: 'Isn't it terrible about the bomb?'
My heart sank. I didn't know what she
was talking about. It was Saturday August 15, 1998. She was talking
about Omagh. Twenty-nine people died, including six teenagers and
five children, and 220 people were injured. They were all just
ordinary people out shopping and socializing.
A few hours later I learned that most
of the youngest killed had come from my home town. Shaun McLaughlin,
Oran Doherty and James Barker all died instantly when the bomb
exploded, they were all just 12 years old. Fernando Blasco Baselga, a
Spanish exchange student learning English in my town, was also
killed. He was just 12 too. Rocio Abad Ramos was a Spanish exchange
group leader, was only 24. By the time I actually reached Omagh that
evening the traffic was still being diverted from the still smoking
town center.
The Omagh bomb killed Protestants and
Catholics, it killed nationalists and unionists, it killed a Mormon
teenager, it killed adults and teenagers and children and it even
killed an infant in its mother's womb.
It was an act of unspeakable savagery.
It was also utterly pointless. It was an admission of the final
collapse and failure of the so-called armed struggle. It was proof of
the nihilism that had prolonged it. It was the last straw.
But the young woman on the plane beside
me didn't think so, I recall. She nodded her head from side to side
and said firmly: 'There will never be peace in Ireland.'
I told her, right to her face, she was
quite wrong. There would be peace now because they had tried every
other alternative. I knew that the time had come, I could feel the
time had come, there it was staring me - and all of us - in the face.
Winston Churchill once said Americans
can always be counted on to do the right thing after they have
exhausted all other possibilities. The Irish were at the same point
in the 1990s. It's human nature, I think, to ignore what has been
staring you in the face for years. It's because of the heavy hand of
history, it's because of the fear of getting it wrong, but if you
wait long enough you'll discover you have no choice.
Throughout the 1990s the Irish public's
reaction to the words 'peace process' became as emotive and
complicated as many Americans reactions to the words 'gun control.' A
significant percentage of the population would glaze over and stop
listening the moment those words were uttered. What we discovered was
that the language would have to change and evolve to bring all
parties to the table.
They had talks about talks, they had
proximity talks, finally they talked face to face. The thing was,
after decades of stalemate, they were finally talking.
Entire government cabinets worked on
drafting the right words. Words were the harbingers of change. Words
matter.
So today I propose that we stop
speaking of 'gun control' and we start talking about 'massacre
prevention.' Because its an aim we can all support. Because the
language matters. You have to change the language to change the reality.
Find the words to talk to your friends
and neighbors about 'massacre prevention.' Don't speak of 'gun
rights' or 'gun control' ever again. It's too late for that anyway. Don't let other people frame your debate for you. Frame your own
debate. The only positive change you are likely to see now depends on
the work you do to find and describe your horror about the shootings
on Friday and your resolve to talk to your friends and neighbors about what needs to
be done.
Ask questions worth asking: why must
our Supreme Court decide who can marry who, but any lunatic with a
pulse can buy a semi automatic? Ask: who does the NRA actually
represent, gun manufacturers or gun owners? Ask: do you want to live
in a nation where the people around you are armed to the teeth and at the ready at
all times?
Ask questions and don't be deterred by
the windy rhetoric that comes back at you. The Second Amendment says
that guns should be 'well regulated.' So why does the NRA oppose
mandatory background checks at gun shows? There are over 300 million
guns in America, almost as many guns as people. After Friday there's
no one in America who can ever argue that they are 'well regulated'
again.
Finally, ask everyone you talk to what would you
do if those children in Connecticut had been yours?
